|
 |
You are here : The Arena
|
|
Welcome to our readers' forums, which we fondly call The Arena. You must be REGISTERED to post here.
|
 |   |  |
 | |  |
 | |  |
 | |  |
 | |  |
 |
|
|
| So - I'm guessing basketball is an international sport. |
|
|
Okay.
The Gasol move is the best? Surely better than Kidd? And surely better than Shaq.
On the Raptors: God I've been loving Calderon. But I have this nagging little suspicion that his game will go down a notch with Ford back. |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
I have no idea who those people are that you're talking about. |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
| Re: So - I'm guessing basketball is an international sport. |
|
|
The Gasol move by a mile, and not just because the Lakers paid basically nothing for him. I thought the Kidd move was frankly bad, they gave away too much and what they brought in doesn't actually address their problems (which weren't even that significant). The Cleveland "completely overhaul our roster halfway through the season" move was a real puzzler, I don't understand the thinking behind that at all.
As for Shaq: shit. It was a huge gamble, but it could pay off. The major thing, clearly, was unloading Marion -- a great player but by all accounts a sulky selfish jackass who was making everyone unhappy.
Calderon: it's too bad Ford is close to untradeable, with his big contract and his spun-glass spine, although having the tandem is nice. They need to play Ford off the bench, though. Jose is absolutely the man.
|
|
|
|
 |  |
|
| |
 |  |
|
|
| having the Calderon/Ford tandem |
|
|
they keep telling us is a good thing. I get the point. The lack of a big rebounder who's also tough really hurts the team though (the one thing missing). And the obvious way to get such a rebounder is through a trade, and the only thing they have to trade that would be worthwhile would be either Calderon or Ford. You could throw in one of Delfino, Parker, or Kapono too - not convinced yet that they are different people.
But - getting to my main point - I am just a little concerned that Calderon will now take a step backward. He's an amazingly passionate player, and I know he respects Ford - but really, his game blossomed with Ford's absence. Last night's game reenforced this.
Twif - you've got to be concerned about the Jays. The Sox are unlikely to benefit from the free ride this year.
|
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
| Re: having the Calderon/Ford tandem |
|
|
Apparently everyone wanted a piece of Calderon coming up to the trade deadline. And yeah, a big tough rebounder is the Raps' biggest weakness, but it's not like they grow on trees. Who was available? Ben Wallace, Shaq? We couldn't afford either unless we unloaded a lot of payroll. I'm glad Colangelo held fire -- it's a young good team, it's not like they're in a "win-now-or-else" situation.
As for the Jays: if everyone stays healthy, it's a good team. If our young arms -- D-Mac, Marcum, Janssen, Litsch -- don't backslide or blow up, it's a good team. That's two big ifs and it goes right to the heart of what's killed us the last few years, endless injuries and young pitchers flaming out after one good year (Chacin, Towers, League...). Plus: why do we have four left fielders? Why sign Stewart to a minor league contract instead of, say, Big Fat Bartolo Colon (hey, twiff).
On a happier note, the Yankees don't look all that scary this year.
|
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
with Rolen and Eckstein look significantly better.
Pitching is a big if for everybody - I don't think it's a bigger if for the Jays than, say, the Red Sox.
Now here's the thing with the Raptors - to keep Calderon, they will have to ante up more dough next year. We both agree they are very young with a great core of players. But they have no financial room to add the missing piece, and their core is going to get more and more expensive every year. The real Colangelo challenge will be how to add the missing piece given the salary cap.
Boston found a way. The Lakers may have found a way. Heck - Dallas may be a better team than they were with Kidd. Phoenix? My money is them taking a step backward with Shaq - but anything's possible.
How horrible would it be for the Nuggets - playing .600 ball to not make the playoffs while Philly and the Knicks get in? |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
Sure, the Jays are a bit better in the infield now with Eck and Rolen (though how much? Eckstein's an offensive upgrade/defensive downgrade at short, Rolen the opposite at third -- go figure). Overbay and Wells should rebound without a problem, Rios and Hill are coming into their own... And sure, pitching and health are big ifs for everybody, but here's the thing -- when was Halladay's last fully healthy season? Four years ago. Burnett? Has he ever had one? Yes, Schilling and Wakefield are almost old enough to be pitching in New York, but then Toronto is counting on three sophomores (four, when Burnett goes down and Janssen has to move back to starting), two of them finesse guys without a lot of stuff. I think the Jays have a real shot, and God knows they're due for some good luck after all the bad they've had, but I'm not planning a flight to Hogtown for the playoffs just yet.
With the Raps, Colangelo will have more collateral (expiring contracts) next year. He's also shown a knack for finding guys like Moon, Parker, and Garbajosa -- filling holes from unexpected places. I think Colangelo would be a fool to let Calderon go, at almost any price -- there's only one or two better young point guards in the league. Calderon should be just below Bosh on the "untouchable" list. |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
I love Calderon more than any other Raptor. Just worried we will see a decline in performance with a decline in his minutes.
Salary cap will be the issue - what room he is able to make will go to keeping Calderon.
On Shannon Stewart - JP has never liked Reed Johnson. That's been the message I'm getting.
On Boston pitching - Dice and Beckett. On the Jays, I don't see Burnett as a #2 any more - given his record, and given the Jays youngsters, he may not have to be. Which allows him the opportunity this year to finally show he can win 15 without any pressure. Doc? Fingers crossed. Ryan should be back, I hope. |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
i was scared of the jays last year, so yeah. if they stay healthy. my understanding is that rolen for glaus was mostly a change o' scenery move. the fact that eckstein actually is an offensive upgrade at short does not bode well though. then again, we have lugo playing short, so who am i to talk?
i like the moves the sox made in the offseason. added depth and didn't really give anything up. casey is a nice bench upgrade over hinske. there is no downside i see to the colon signing. schilling being hurt means they don't have to put him out to pasture to make room for bucholz. wake is a knuckler, so as long as his back holds up, he can pitch till he's 80. |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
Our incumbent shortstop, John McDonald, is arguably the best defensive short in the AL, but a black hole at the plate. The only serious upside I can see to the Eckstein signing is that the Jays should be getting a lot of loving attention from the FJM boys this year. Rolen for Glaus was mostly exactly that, I think both players will do better in their new environments.
Honestly, though, I don't expect us to challenge the Sox for the division, barring something huge and unforeseen (like Beckett's arm falling off, or Matsuzaka going insane and stabbing Manny in the neck, or something). But I think we can challenge the Yanks and the Indians and the Mariners for the wild card. (knocking frantically on wood)
|
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
Nobody's mentioned Eckstein's grit and hustle.
More seriously, I pooh-poohed the "Red Sox have found a new way to win!" talk from 2004, but now it seems they have. The Yankees can compete with them by spending, but I don't see how the rest of the division can hang.
---
I don't follow the NBA that closely anymore, but it does seem that the Lakers did come out the best. It's interesting how quickly they were able to re-load to be a title contender after letting go of Shaq. |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
| Sure, he's got grit and hustle |
|
|
but I understand his moxie was down to a subpar .322 swagger percentage last year. Luckily, Rolen brings a .375 swp and, if healthy, can grind at almost a .400 dirty-uniform clip.
|
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
The Eckstein comment was just bait for twiffer, who never tires of stories of Eckstein's hustle.
In seriousness, he will probably give below average production from that position. I don't think changing leagues will do him any favors, either. |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
|
grit and hustle is implied when speaking of eckstein. it is an aura that surrounds him. he's short, white and not particularly good; so of course he's gritty and hustle-ly.
the question on my mind though, is who wants coco? i like him alot, but ellsbury is better offensively and nearly as good defensively (which is saying a lot, as crisp is a fantastic defensive CF). if he can (consistently) find his swing again, he can really help a team. i do wonder though, if there are splits available for him based on playing with an afro vs. cornrows. he always seemed to hit better with the afro. gotta suck to be in that position: too good to be a 4th outfielder on any team but the one you're on. |
|
|
|
 |  |
|
|
| Re: Sure, he's got grit and hustle |
|
|
you know, standardizing intangible stats would be a great article to do. sure, it's been done before, but it's too fun not to do again.
|
|
|
|
|  |
 | |  |
 | |  |
 | |  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Home | And Now For The News | The Arena | The Comics Page | About Quiblit
|
|
|