Monday, October 13, 2008 | |
 
 

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

 
Logo by
 

Welcome to our readers' forums, which we fondly call The Arena. You must be REGISTERED to post here.

 
  The Arena  Departments  Excess Hollywoo...  survival shows
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 1/25/2008 8:19 AM
  twiffer
410 posts
2nd Level Poster




survival shows 

i've caught some of both of those shows, but after watching one episode of man vs. wild, i've made it a point never to watch the damnable show again.  i may not be a survial expert, but i know enough to realize that, if one is lost above the treeline in the high sierras (or any mountains.  or, frankly, anywhere) the first thing one does NOT do is jump in a fucking river, driftwood raft (crafted with secret indian techinque) or not.  unless one equates "survival and escape" with "death by hypothermia".  personally, i don't.  and yet, that was the first action mr. bear undertook.  follow the river, yes.  use it for drinking water, yes.  jump in the frigid, icy, rapid-filled river, er, no. 

i spent the rest of the episode yelling at the tv, and mr. bear.  i yelled at him for wasting time and energy carving throwing sticks with which to hunt rabbits.  i yelled at him for jumping in a fucking lake, in order to swim to the highway, instead of walking around it.  i yelled at him for having a tin cup, but no compass or visible knife.  and so on.  then i decided never to watch his damned show again.  sure, knowing how to forage and hunt is helpful if you intend to stay lost in the forest.   but if your goal is to get out of the woods, food can wait.  water is important, and staying warm.  you can last a week or two without eating.  surely, if you simply gone astray on a hike, and accidently kicked your entire pack off a thousand foot cliff, you don't intend to stay any longer than necessary?

likely, my expectations of getting useful and practical advice were, shall we say, a bit high.  still, isn't it reasonable to think that, when watching a show on survival techniques, the very first tip shouldn't be to do something that will likely kill you?

 
New Post 1/25/2008 8:48 AM
  Keifus
393 posts
3rd Level Poster




Re: survival shows 

Twiff: if you don't stay with it, you'll never get to watch the episode where Bear sucks water out of an elephant turd.  Really.  I'm pretty sure that Man Versus Wild is nothing more than an excuse to watch the guy abuse himself and eat really disgusting things.  (You just know he was the kid in the boy scouts who'd eat worms for a buck on a campout.)  The numbnut isn't surviving--he's got a whole crew behind the camera with emerency blankets and radios--he's, um, demonstrating survival skills, including the retarded things not to do except in the biggest desperation. 

Michael: Although I agree with your last sentence more or less, but I don't agree there's a really clear line.  What separates these survival guys from the death-wish noodleheads is the level of preparation and awareness.  I frankly doubt Grylls' or Stroud's manly facing down of the elements much different in motivation than Irwin's or grizzly boy's, they're just considerably more careful and less stupid about it.

I wouldn't be surprised if the 73-year-old tightrope really was checking out.  After all, he must have known the risks by then.  By some measures, I'd say that was a rather dignified way to go.

 
New Post 1/25/2008 11:09 AM
  twiffer
410 posts
2nd Level Poster




Re: survival shows 

yeah, yeah...i know.  i suppose there is the part of me that worries about those who watch and think they are learning something useful.  instead of just gettting sensationalism.

granted, i also get irritated by that truck commercial where, when faced with an apparently annoyed grizzly, some dumbass gets out of his humongeous truck, grabs a salmon and tosses it to the bear.  bears are amazing creatures: highly intelligent and certainly, like any large predator, given a bad rap.  that said, they are also extremely large, powerful and fast predators that, while not going out of their way to eat people, certainly have no qualms about it.  and god forbid you give a she-bear any reason to think you are a threat to her cubs.  then you're just fucked.  but i digress.

as far as mr. irwin, i don't think the shock and surprise at his death was due to him being killed while working.  instead, i think everyone was expecting him to get his head bitten off by croc, or a snakebite to the nuts.  something a bit more dramatic than a lucky shot by a stingray.  it was the relative benignness of the creature that killed him that was shocking...i'm sure most Discovery execs thoughts were along these lines:  "Wait, a stingray?  He got killed by a fucking ray?  You're absolutely positive he wasn't devoured by a great white shark when he tried to give it scritches under it's chin?  No?  Didn't get bitten in half by a sperm whale?  No?  Just a fucking, measely stingray?  Well, frankly, I'm stunned that he died like this."

 
New Post 1/25/2008 12:00 PM
  Michael Kenney
394 posts
3rd Level Poster




Re: survival shows 

Twiff~ In the episode you mentioned, the first thing Grylls did was scramble down the mountain to a point below the timberline. Then he got his bearings and built a rough shelter and a fire. Farther down the mountain he came to the river, and it was there that he built the raft out of driftwood (hard to find driftwood above the timberline.) His logic was that he can cover 10-15 miles in an hour floating down the river, as opposed to a few miles a day in the forest. His whole thrust was that if you find yourself stranded on a mountain, get the fuck off the mountain.

Keith~ The difference I see between people like Grylls and Stroud, and people like Wallenda, Irwin, and Treadwell is stark. The former do everything they can to minimize the danger, and get the hell out of hazardous situations as quickly as they can, whereas the latter got intentionally as close to the danger as they could.

In the case of Irwin, that wasn't enough. Not only did he place himself juuuuuust out of the lunging range of a crocodile, he did so while holding his own child, an infant, in his arm. A total batshit moron.

73 year old men don't belong on hig-wires, not just because high-wires are dangerous, but also because they're 73 year old men. A crazy old man with a crazy family who allowed him to do that shit well past his "prime" high-wire age.

Treadwell is the most ridiculous example of all. A numbskull who went to a place where wild bears roam around, and got himself eaten. The only real tragedy in the whole thing is that they "had to" destroy the bear in question, just to make sure Treadwell and Amie's body parts were inside.

It reminds me of the time Chris Rock went off on Siegfried and Roy...."Roy Horn got his fucking head bitten by a tiger, and the people are saying the fucking tiger went crazy!! The fucking tiger did not go crazy, the fucking tiger went tiger!"

The bear that ate Treadwell didn't go crazy, it went bear, and got killed because it ate an insane waiter from Malibu who was practically begging to be eaten.

 
New Post 1/25/2008 12:18 PM
  Keifus
393 posts
3rd Level Poster




Dude, minimizing the danger 

The very first thing to do that is not intentionally strand yourself in the elements.  Grylls and Stroud are thrill seekers too.  Much wiser and saner than some of 'em (and god help me, I'd do it too if I had the time and the means and the will), but I can't believe they're not totally getting off on the experience.

I agree about a deathwish, but I just think there's a gray area there.  Treadwell may well have had one.  Irwin probably didn't, but was pretty damn overconfident.  Wallenda, well, let's put it this way.  My job is science and engineering, and if I loved it (which I don't really, but let's say I did), and if my exit looked imminent, I just might prefer a huge lab explosion as my way out.  Wallenda was a tightrope walker in a family of tightrope walkers (I googled).  He'd been doing it since he was an infant.

 
New Post 1/28/2008 8:07 AM
  twiffer
410 posts
2nd Level Poster




Re: survival shows 

mike: my memory might be a bit hazy on just when he jumped in the river, but regardless, it was stupid.  sure, i understand the logic.  but getting off the mountain faster doesn't help if you kill yourself.  no gear means no extra clothes, means stay fucking dry.  if i recall, he made some mention of hypothermia after getting out of the water.  well, the number one rule for avoiding hypothermia is to STAY DRY.  purposefully jumping in a river sort of goes against that.

sure, mountain rivers are fast.  they are also cold and oft filled with rapids.  i'm sorry, but the speed of river travel does not out weigh the risk of drowning, hypothermia and breaking some limb against rocks.  it was bad advice and shown purely for spectacle.

 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  The Arena  Departments  Excess Hollywoo...  survival shows
  Maximize
Home | And Now For The News | The Arena | The Comics Page | About Quiblit
Copyright 2008 by quiblit.com | Privacy Statement | Terms Of Use